I’ve read a number of ‘city scape’ books lately, so I was at first wary of this. It’s hard to compare anything to Shriek: An Afterword after all, with autochthonous landscapes, mystery, and horror.
Perdido St Station is the story of a… “fringe” scientist in a steampunk/fantasy Earth-like cityscape. Actually, if anyone has the actual word for “cityscape” novel, I’d love to hear it. Anyhow, Isaac Dan der Grimnebulin is approached by a character who commissions him to perform a near-miracle and restore to him something taken as a punishment. And then we’re off into New Corbuzon, with it’s mutilayered society of xenomorphs, cyborgs, weird natives, urban poor, criminals, and a million other ‘critters’.
Where Mieville’s style differs from other cityscape writers is it’s apparent lack of analogy. What I took from Shriek, and Trial of Flowers, was strong analogies of modern cities, with the “under-city” existing without apparent knowledge of the “normal” people couched in the cityscape. In Shriek the Greycaps have an entire universe unapparent to the humans upon which they feed, and in Trial of Flowers a series of unknowable and terrible Gods are kept at bay by the systematic mistreatment of an underclass of dwarves. In PSS though, the underclass or ‘other’ is essentially on the same level as normal humanity, with the potential tension inherent in difference unexploited by the author. Instead, an alien element is introduced, and it is this that acts as antagonist.
Personally? I prefer the undercity element to drive the tension in the story. There is something about this analogy that I find compelling. Modern cities are very much divided into mainstream and other, and the characterisation and exploitation of this difference in scifi serves the genre well. Since we can’t focus on the Commies anymore, the concept of the terrible and violent unknown within our midst is a powerful motif. It can be as simple as counter-culture and “drop-outs” not participating and agitating against status quo, or as sopisticated as a network of exploitation of the majority for nefarious ends. The possibilities are endless, and highly relevant to a well-established urban population.
This small criticism aside, PSS is a fun read, and recommended.
4 March, 2009 at 8:57 pm
First time reader of your blog: I read PSS a while ago and loved it. If you enjoyed Shriek I hope you have read city of saints and madmen? I love his work but I especially liked Veniss Underground.
5 March, 2009 at 5:11 am
Personally, I love the placement of a word like “autochthonous” directly after “it’s”
Yrs eT
(Currently reading Galactic North by Alastair Reynolds)
5 March, 2009 at 8:58 am
Doh. That’s what you get for writing after a long, long day.
5 March, 2009 at 11:36 am
I trust you will forgive my juvenile pedantry – small minds enjoy petty pursuits.
5 March, 2009 at 2:26 pm
5 March, 2009 at 11:25 pm
btw – have you read his Un lun dun? =)
7 March, 2009 at 8:02 am
nah, this was a recommendation that worked out well! wil be checking out more of his books.
23 March, 2009 at 12:12 pm
There’s two sequels, although I didn’t find them as cool as the first.
The Iron Council (the third) actually works quite well as an anarchist tract.
But I’ll generally read anything I can find of his. The very first book he wrote – I think “King Rat” (same as the James Clavell title) is also quite good.
27 March, 2009 at 12:04 pm
I love this book; in fact I’d go so far as to say it is my all-toime favourite, and all Mieville’s other work. His book of short stories, “Looking for Jake’ is wonderful. Your criticism of PSS is interesting because Mieville is a bit of a Marxist, has a PhD in a Marxian interpretation of something to do with international law/politics and is very politically active. I personally found the book intensely politically charged. It seemed to me like New Crobuzon is a society with very little middle-upper-class – I don’t think that that is so far-fetched. Isn’t that class the very one that is continually being eroded by the upwards wealth distribution on the last few decades?