As a whole this book is a bit of a non-event, and seems to introduce some ideas for their own sake, particularly because the plot contains virtually no dramatic tension whatsoever. It’s main interest to me became the handling of some specific ideas.
Permutation City provides a setting where technology has developed enough to allow the uploading of a person’s consciousness to a virtual reality. It’s now an old idea, essentially as far back as Gibson, but Egan explores notions of what virtual lives, and possibly the idea of a singularity, will mean for the consciousness’ captured.
In this treatment of the concept of virtual consciousness there were three ideas that really captured me. First virtual consciousness as a means to drop oneself into hell, purgatory, or heaven in the same vein as Jacob’s Ladder. Second the possibility of falling into solopism, although Egan makes this particular solopism an Eden story. Third and finally was the idea of Matroshka worlds and consciousness’, something that should be familiar to fans of the Matrix
Problematically these two worlds, and the world of the main protagonists, only overlap casually, and only really act to complement one obliquely.
So overall this is an interesting read, but would need something really dramatic to make it a more compelling read. Perhaps ninjas?
11 December, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Egan’s novels are purely speculative fiction, looking for drama in them is like looking for plot in the yellow pages. But as a discussion of consciousness and materiality, for my money permutation city cannot be beat.
I’m so buying myself Incandescence for Christmas.
11 December, 2008 at 5:01 pm
ah, that explains it then. if outlining ideas was the intent, then he’s done swimmingly.
i especially like the contrast between the two solopist nation people, and the evil loner guy. crazy.
although, how those two got in on the action was only brushed over…
meh.
11 December, 2008 at 6:05 pm
Nice explanation Giovanni. I read a lot of non-fiction but went through a period of devouring Greg Egan. I liked Permutation just for those reasons.
17 December, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Or you could just take a course in philosophy or mind or metaphysics. In retrospect, Axiomatic reads like a summary of debates on personal identity (one theory per story), and one Permutation City‘s “dust theory” seems based on a comment of John Searle’s about his office wall running a word processor…