I was initially confused by this book until I read that was originally published as four short stories between 1942 and 1944. The fifth “chapter” was added when the stories were published as a book in 1951.
That first of all explains a lot, because like Accelerando the stories themselves only loosely hang together. There is continuity, but it is slightly disjointed. Secondly, it is amazing, because Asimov talks about atomic power and power stations like they’re already a reality, not something decades away. Of course, the man is a science fiction writer, so you expect that kind of imaginative expansion, but still.
The basis of Foundation is a decadent Empire, one nearing total collapse, in which a mathematician and psychologist called Hari Seldon has predicted the end. Seldon has ten thousand families sent to the farthest corner of the galaxy, and there established a foundation to write an ‘Encyclopedia Galatica’. This book will hold human knowledge and accelerate the recovery the Empire 30 fold.
Foundation is an interesting read. It’s primarily dialog, which makes sense when you’re writing short stories and have limited space, but is also restricted to a set of characters overcoming limits crises to avert near-disaster. It was fascinating, but I kind of pined for something of substance to give me a story to read. As it was the reader kind of rolls from one short, highly imaginative description to another without any real satisfaction. I’m hoping that the next book in the series will be more gritty.
These limited criticisms aside, Asimov really is the genius people say he is. I remember reading him many, many years ago, but this is the first time I’ve closely considered one of his books. And he writes beautifully. I looked for traces that would date the style, but other than a near-complete absence of female characters (there is one foot-stamping princess. I can’t remember any others), and a fascination with ‘atomic power’ the stories could easily have been written by contemporary authors.
So, yet another recommended read. Sooner or later I’ll find something that I don’t like, and tell you about it.
20 August, 2007 at 1:37 am
The loose structure I think continues in the next book…but there is a common link intertwined through them. They say, Asimov actually took inspiration from disintegration of the Roman empire to write the foundation series. Try reading it with that theme in your head…maybe it would be more interesting.
20 August, 2007 at 2:07 am
Asimov talks about atomic power and power stations like they’re already a reality, not something decades away.
Decades? While the Italian navigator didn’t enter the new world until December 2, 1942, the possibility had been understood since 1938 or so, and it was just a matter of time and engineering until someone did it – much the same as nuclear fusion is now.
20 August, 2007 at 5:35 am
Be careful. If you like Foundation, there are now 14 books in the series.
Asimov never handled female characters very well, but Susan Calvin in his robot series was a worthy exception.
20 August, 2007 at 6:53 am
ahhh… i knew there was an explanation.
20 August, 2007 at 9:56 am
Try “The three stigmata of Plamer Eldritch”, I managed to complete it….has some modern paralells
20 August, 2007 at 5:18 pm
I loved his old SF magazine
“Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction” found a whole bunch for like $2 bucks at 1/2 price books, his editorials are really really great, and the ‘gaming’ section, talk about a flashback in time….
20 August, 2007 at 5:37 pm
I picked up one of the Foundation books again recently, read about 50 pages, and put it down again, thoroughly bored. Yet I loved them when I was a teenager. I think the problem is that his characters are really just walking bundles of ideas, not people at all. It really wouldn’t matter if he had just randomly alternated male and female names, or named them A, B, C, D, etc. It’s very hard to differentiate them.
20 August, 2007 at 8:21 pm
Yeah, I love a lot of Asimov’s short stories and some of his other novels, but the Foundation Saga just never really did it for me. It’s one of those series I found a lot better in the ideas than the writing – like the LOTR. Still, I read the first four, and when the prequels started coming out, I gave up in disgust.
21 August, 2007 at 12:09 am
You should seek out the two volumes of Jewish-themed sci-fi shorts he curated– great stuff!
21 August, 2007 at 8:21 am
Heh. While you’re reading all the books I pored over at age 12… how about comparing Arthur C Clarke’s Childhood’s End & RendezvousWith Rama? – both about humans meeting up with ET for the first time, one written near the start of the author’s career, the other near the end.
and
http://www.cracked.com/index.php?name=News&sid=2304&pageid=1
They nearly made a Rama film….
21 August, 2007 at 8:31 am
Heh. I read quite a few of these as a kid too. Just can’t really remember them all that well. You’ll be glad to know I’m switching to “literature” after this!
I have all the background for sci-fi writing i need!