On the back of a recent and positive DomPost article on public sector blogging, this Daily Mail article was brought to my attention. Now, if you read the article cold you’ll think the guy has been undermining the government by writing potentially seditious posts and generally acting like some kind of deviant.
Naturally it’s a media beat-up and venal exaggeration, and a fisking of the Daily Mail article demonstrates pretty clearly the dangers we face as blogging public servants. It’s also generated some heat among British public sector bloggers. Mostly in a very polite kind of way, but there you go.
What is obvious is that Jason Ryan’s recent post on ‘your blog as a resume’ is all too pertinent. The things we write in jest or haste have never been more accessible or mis-quotable.
Here in godzone I experienced a rather obvious and annoying use of misquotation when I was writing for Public Address, courtesy of our resident right-wing doyen David Farrar. At the time I wasn’t too concerned, pissed-off certainly, but had the issue been taken to the levels that Owen Barder has experienced it could be another matter altogether.
Russell Brown pointed out awhile ago that the first thing people seem to do when a person hits the media in a negative sense is look for a MySpace page. The expectation is that lunatics are highly likely to have recorded their decline in some such social networking site. And sadly, they all too often do.
But… most of us just write a blog as a form of socialisation and communication. Consequently, there is a strong need to ensure that we’re careful about what we put online because it is so easy to misrepresent written content. This is especially pertinent when it comes to not having readers conflate our blog interests with our work interests. Problematically, the risk of conflation seems no greater than the same type of interests being conflated in the real world. But that is a misnomer.
The Barder example demonstrates very clearly that web2.0 of any variety needs to be approached very carefully if you are planning on taking public office or a public service position. Where drunken crazy youth is something we’ve all come to expect, it’s hard to dredge up hearsay about a person’s actions from 10 or 20 years ago. Drunken crazy youth online is a different matter altogether.
As an aside… it seriously annoys me that I’ve become something like a voice of mature adulthood in this matter. The internet used to be all about guerrilla information. That it’s become far less cyberpunk and far more cybernanny should be regarded as one of the great tragedies… The cold reality we’re left with though is that everything we place online can now be used as a megaphone with which to slander us.
The best strategy seems to be the careful avoidance of things that can become bludgeons in the hands of bruisers like the Daily Times. If you’re the kind of person who engages in political commentary on your blog, podcast, whatever, then you’re also highly likely to be the kind of person who’s going to become involved in politics or public office. Consequently, once you get past the angry yoof stage of your public awareness, the things you have written will be laid bare for critics. But you need to publicise your anger in order to establish a public voice, learn the ropes, etc.
Bit of a catch-22 really.
Does this mean that all we can ever talk about is lolcats and sports? Possibly. Until some sense of the ground rules about cherry-picking blog content are properly determined then everyone is at risk of having their thoughts or opinions laid bare and misrepresented (or accurately represented in the future, when they’ve evolved or changed). Doubtless the courts will determine what is permissible and what is not in this issue.
So what to do in the meantime?
Well, if you’ve got a blog you really don’t want people to read, then take it down. It’s cached somewhere, but at least the more stupid of your detractors won’t find it easily. You can’t remove old comments from other people’s sites, but at least they’re less accessible than a big aggregation of the same embarrassing thought.
If you’re new to blogging? Then just be warned, a hot-heated morning with too much coffee can, and will, become a permanent record. If you’re a public servant who wants to blog, try to avoid typing anything at all around heated events in the political cycle. That means elections, s.59, foreshore and seabed…
Otherwise? Jump to it!!
23 May, 2007 at 6:24 pm
Nice post.
I think that we forget that in expressing ourselves and arguing with others on blogs that occasionally these things will be picked up by the MSM. It doesn’t happen often but when it does boy can it be uncomfortable – particularly when it’s such a hatchet job as the one Owen’s had.
And if you want to see the less polite responses to the Daily Mail I’d start here.
23 May, 2007 at 8:16 pm
Yeah for sure, I wish I had a less unique name.
Jane Smith or some such. I tried to hide my identity on myspace, which works until someone insists on using your name in the comments.
Feck.
I think everyone is still learning the ropes with the technology.
23 May, 2007 at 9:17 pm
andrew, thanks for the link. i’ve updated the post.
i find it interesting that you characterise this as a conversation ‘amongst ourselves’. here in nzl we’re constantly reminded that the newspapers are out to get public servants.
that they’re not is no consolation.
23 May, 2007 at 11:24 pm
There’s been a few occasions where the storms in a tea cup that pass through our blogging communities have either come to the notice of the press or been forced there.
They almost always seem to surprise us because it’s like having the argument you might have down the pub turning up in the paper the next morning.
And as so much we say doesn’t get reported we start to think that we’re safe here inside the ’sphere, until the bucket of water is thrown on our heads.
24 May, 2007 at 8:31 am
and that’s exactly the danger newbies need to be made aware of.
context had little meaning in the barder example, and there’s nothing to say it couldn’t happen again. it’s quite a dilemma when you’re trying, as we are here, to convince the wider public service that “govt2.0″ is a useful tool.
24 May, 2007 at 8:59 am
I’m quite interested in what you say here:
I’m fairly sure that the internet was always for academics to pass information to eaach other in a free and easy fashion. (Oh and pron, lots of pron). But I don’t know if it was ever “guerrilla”. That element seems more of a recent construction.
People have always known exactly what you were doing on the internet (that’s right, you). And I would guess that the number of people who can “find” you on the internet would have increased by a huge amount over the last few years, however, the percentage of these people to the number using teh internets wouldn’t have grown that much at all.
I’ve got more to say but I need a second coffee in order to collect my thoughts.
Hadyn Green
Mandarin
24 May, 2007 at 9:39 am
“blockquote” for quotes bro.
25 May, 2007 at 11:37 am
[...] Che Tibby points out, a “hot-heated morning with too much coffee can, and will, become a permanent record. If [...]
25 May, 2007 at 1:26 pm
hadyn, two words about “guerilla internet”.
anarchist’s cookbook.
i think a lot of people just didn’t know what all the geeks were up to, for a fair old while.
25 May, 2007 at 2:39 pm
I don’t beleive in the existence of Geeks, there are no geeks, only cyclists…lonely, solo, sad cyclists…pedalling for where we do not know, coming from where, we do not know. But if they stop pedalling, they fall.
26 May, 2007 at 1:16 pm
[...] So, it doesn’t really look like an option for us public service bloggers who have, as Che Tibby describes it, a hot-heated morning with too much [...]
26 May, 2007 at 3:30 pm
I’d be quite keen to see SSC create a blogging policy (similar to IBMs) as part of the Code of Conduct, or recommend agencies create one.
It’s something I’m encouraging at a agency that maybe dipping it’s toes into the “Govt 2.0″ space.
28 May, 2007 at 8:25 am
oops! rosferabbit’s comment in “every day” should be here! (deleted the wrong one)
28 May, 2007 at 12:43 pm
Oops, I posted on the wrong thread, this is as it should be, giggles maniacally, spells more worser.