well, in a word, ordinary. if these are telecom’s best prospects, then we’re all as doomed as those lost fools using xtra.
i shouldn’t be too harsh. some of the young artists included in the exhibition definitely had the feel of ‘rising’ talent, meaning they seemed to have potential to produce some truly interesting pieces. other stuff was just shit.
the stuff i liked is anything that demonstrated a young artist learning their craft, perhaps making a few mistakes, but generally honing their skills. the infinity guitar case was interesting for example. the big cardboard box that occasionally jumped like something was under it? very well made, but the idea was a little dull. giant canvasses with paint smeared all over them? boring, and not very arty. evokes strong connotations of “4 year old niece”.
there were a few bloody awful paintings like that in there, more than a few, and the exhibition is really only saved by the craft and sculpture.
i’ll have to go back and take another look. i think after a couple of drinks on a friday night i’m not 100% focussed on art, and having luke buda belting out chimes in the background was a little distracting. all in all though, “good side of average”
24 March, 2007 at 4:16 pm
I think the strongest work was in the multimedia field. When you go back, spend some time with “Pink and White Terraces” and “U.F.O.B.”.
24 March, 2007 at 5:28 pm
i agree entirely. i saw the UFOB room and was well impressed. kind of skipped over pink and white terraces, and that was what i wanted to see.
the crocheted bbq and the bicycle was also great.
25 March, 2007 at 12:23 am
You sure it wasn’t the stultifying effect of a day-long evaluation summit rather than those couple drinks that blurred your focus on art? Tune in to Kim Hill’s interview with an art critic today (sorry, can’t remember his name) for an interesting explanation of modern art…
25 March, 2007 at 10:12 am
ummm…. possibly… will definitely take a closer look this week.